Article "Apito de Ouro" in Portuguese Wikipedia has 35.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 31 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Apito de Ouro", its content was written by 9 registered users of Portuguese Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 91 times in Portuguese Wikipedia and cited 91 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #85658 02.2012 |
Global: #2027289 02.2012 |
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #8698 04.2015 |
Global: #474275 04.2015 |
On 18 September 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: pager, Salvatore Schillaci, Hezbollah, UEFA Champions League, 2024–25 UEFA Champions League, 2024 Lebanon communication device explosions, Lyle and Erik Menéndez, Sean Combs, deaths in 2024, Shōgun.
In Portuguese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Pablo Marçal, Igor Coronado, ChatGPT, Pager, Tabata Amaral, Salvatore Schillaci, Timbaúba, AMBEV, Setembro Amarelo, Liga dos Campeões da UEFA.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(15.89+20.13+9.09+31.25+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
